Commons:Deletion requests/2025/12/18

17 December 2025

19 December 2025

Deletion requests on 18 December 2025

December 18

File:Black mourning ribbon in Ramat Gan, May 2024 10.jpg

It's not clear that the image of Ran Gvili has a free license. Additionally, the website for these posters has a copyright notice: "All rights are reserved Hostages and Missing Families Forum (c)". See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:January 2024 in Tel Aviv-Yafo. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 00:07, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COM:DW - We've deleted a ton of these already. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:23, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black mourning ribbon in Ramat Gan, May 2024 09.jpg

It's not clear that the image of Bar Kupershtein has a free license. Additionally, the website for these posters has a copyright notice: "All rights are reserved Hostages and Missing Families Forum (c)". See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:January 2024 in Tel Aviv-Yafo. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COM:DW - We've deleted a ton of these already. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:23, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:HML - Line 10.png

Similarly to the previous request at Commons:Deletion requests/Invented line number icons, the same uploader uploaded this new "Line 10" icon, in reference to the Hurontario LRT, without any proper authorship and sourcing attribution. While I acknowledge that there appears to have been some physical signage installed and reference to the designation in this seemingly official Metrolinx map, there has been a complete lack of reliable secondary sourcing confirming the line will be officially designated as "Line 10", pending any official announcement by Metrolinx, the authority in charge of the project. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and a lot is still subject to change regarding the line's official designation. Furthermore, the shade of blue being used on this file does not appear to match the one on the physical signage and map, and with an absence of authorship and source attribution, it's possible that this file constitutes original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. If the "Line 10" designation is retained, then a superior quality and accurate file should be utilized at that time. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 00:32, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raven 2025 5.jpg

The copyright owner is "FRED BRIGGS" from the camera metadata Leoboudv (talk) 01:04, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All of the photos I checked on that account have FRED BRIGGS in their metadata, and are from the same camera, so I think it's safe to assume that ZekeDane is FRED BRIGGS. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raven 2025 3.jpg

Keep All of the photos I checked on that account have FRED BRIGGS in their metadata, and are from the same camera, so I think it's safe to assume that ZekeDane is FRED BRIGGS. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raven 2025 6.jpg

Keep All of the photos I checked on that account have FRED BRIGGS in their metadata, and are from the same camera, so I think it's safe to assume that ZekeDane is FRED BRIGGS. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnitaChui honger.jpg

The URL[1] for the license statement contains only one portrait photo. shizhao (talk) 02:45, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bondi Beach shooters, Campsie.gif

Extremely grainy image with subject hard to distinguish from background. TheTechie (talk) 19:00, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason for deletion; it's completely distinguishable by me, especially given the addition graphics. I suspect the actual reason is more akin "it stops us from using a non-free version on the English Wikipedia", (which the deletion nominator here is essentially arguing at the EnWiki FFD?[2]) which is an awful reason to deprive other Wikipedias without fair use of a free image. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:49, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not everything is about the deletion discussion on enwiki. This discussion is completely unrelated to my vote there and genuine concern about whether it is distinguishable enough to have an educational purpose. TheTechie (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: COM:INUSE. —Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 22:28, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bondi Beach shooters, Campsie.gif

File is tagged as PD-CCTV but does not entirely consist of fixed CCTV footage without human input. The panning, addition of a red circle tracking the suspect and tinting of the background were all presumably done manually, and may exceed the extremely low COM:TOO Australia. EvenTwist41 (talk) 03:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OMG SOMEONE DREW A CIRCLE Keep. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 21:40, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarah Natochenny By John E Manard.jpg

I took photo and uploaded it would like to remove it Npgeek73 (talk) 03:58, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of courtesy deletion period, but there are a lot of other, better photos of this person in Category:Sarah Natochenny, including several by this uploader, so I don't see a courtesy deletion here as an issue.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:33, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avallon - Place Vauban - boîte à livres.jpg

Already exist in a an higher resolution at File:Avallon - Place Vauban - Boîte à livres 2.jpg I made a mistake reuploading it Symac (talk) 04:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spanish Speaking Countries.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Tudjomarar as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: fiction - Not a valid speedy deletion rationale The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Maybe not eligible for speedy, but a map of "Spanish speaking countries" which omits Spain, but includes Brazil, is clearly unusable. Omphalographer (talk) 20:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Flickr set

File:DGT-LogoUpdateApr2024 EN-White.svg

Borderline too complex for pd-textlogo (the CC license is, of course, nonsense) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autumn rain In EXPLORED 2 - 12 - 2025 - Flickr - seenbynick.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 06:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melissa Aldana Quartet 14 januari 2024 Bimhuis Amsterdam - Melissa Aldana (53468266129).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melissa Aldana Quartet 24 maart 2023 Paradox Tilburg - Melissa Aldana (52770330515).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melissa Aldana Quartet 24 maart 2023 Paradox Tilburg - Melissa Aldana (52770330935).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian Snacks (27109300089).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:52, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Low Keys - Flickr - GR167.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Red panda bot as no license (No license since) Krd 06:52, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paper money - india - 500 rupie (50040317686).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:52, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:S India 2015 0253 (48158197417).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:52, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star fishes scattered on Karwar beach, India. (28858906991).jpg

This file was initially tagged by JM082 as no license (No license since) Krd 06:52, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 13:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herborg Torkilsdóttir, fo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Stanglavine as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herborg Torkilsdóttir, musiker.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Hjart as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo TAISCTE Antigo.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veículos Monarcas Erechim 101 Anos.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Abzeronow as no permission (No permission since) Krd 06:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution photo from 2019 with no EXIF, looked suspicious to me. Abzeronow (talk) 02:29, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:João Marinho Neto113.jpg

This is not under CC, these were created by the Neto family and distributed to Longeviquest, later republished by Guinness World Records. https://longeviquest.com/2025/10/worlds-oldest-man-joao-marinho-neto-celebrates-113th-birthday/ Katzrockso (talk) 07:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eric Gilbertson, K2, Karakoram Range, Asia, July 2022.jpg

Opening discussion on behalf of User Graywalls who believes this is not truly CC-0 Revolving Doormat (talk) 07:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Eric Gilberton's talk page, I asked him to either upload his own work, have someone upload their own work, or point me to a copyright-free photograph. I was pretty clear in my request: [3]

I am not convinced by the evidence presented in the former discussion by Gilbertson's instagram post: [4], which does not credit Andreas Frydensberg, his climbing partner with taking the photo. It could have been taken with a timer and/or a tripod. I have asked Gilbertson outright if Andreas Frydensberg took the photo and I think we should await his answer. Revolving Doormat (talk) 07:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will also say that in looking at the uploads on the K2 post on Gilbertson's blog, including the obvious selfies, they all indicate they were taken with the same device. Revolving Doormat (talk) 08:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Previously, a user named Keithgilbertson uploaded the photo, claiming to be his own. Interesting two "separate" people have uploaded the same photo on different platforms citing it to be their own, huh? Graywalls (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what this has to do with anything. I merely said I repeatedly told Gilbertson on his talk page that the photo needed to be something he authored for him to upload or release copyright. There was no evidence indicating that Andreas Frydensberg took the photo on the Instagram link used as rationale in the previous deletion; in fact I found it on a Dutch news article that they both were interviewed for in which they said Gilbertson provided the photo.

Based on his response to my question, he now seems to understand that the author of a photograph is the person who takes the photograph, that he doesn't own the rights to it simply because it was taken by his device. Revolving Doormat (talk) 17:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @Graywalls Revolving Doormat (talk) 07:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI - Eric Gilbertson has admitted that an unnamed climber took the photo with his phone, thus this should be speedy deleted. Revolving Doormat (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: , would you please review this? I think the argument of the person who reuploaded the item that had been previously been uploaded and deleted by a different account is not reasonable. You've previously deleted it under File:K2_Eric_Gilbertson_on_summit.png Thank you Graywalls (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per photographed subject's own admission, he is not the photographer. The ownership of physical device is irrelevant, thus this qualifies for immediate deletion under F6. Admission at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Eric_Gilbertson#photos Graywalls (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Graywalls, I found evidence that showed the author of the photo was not Andreas Frydensberg, and no evidence that ever supported the claim that it was in the previous deletion (though it is clear it was not Keith Gilbertson). I also mentioned that it was taken with the same device that took the other photos, including ones he clearly was the author of, thus it could be reasonably inferred that he could be the author and have used a camera timer to take it himself.

I then asked Gilbertson if the photo was taken by Frydensberg. I never argued there was no copyvio, I merely argued it was possible. None of this is unreasonable and I agree it should be speedily deleted. Revolving Doormat (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Herbythyme. --Rosenzweig τ 10:09, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/"Loewental, Arthur Imanuel (1879-....)"

Ca. 1914 to 1916 German medals by Arthur Loewenthal (1879–1964), still protected by copyright in Germany. So the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2035.

Rosenzweig τ 07:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hanns Georgi

Hanns Georgi died in 1989, so these works sadly not yet free.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 08:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kagamid (talk · contribs)

Images marked "own work" but they all appear to be from the web

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rational for deletion is not a good one. Many images from webpages are acceptable. Many of these come from a "Free stock photos" website. Please at least go through a regular deletion process. Krok6kola (talk) 17:09, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even if that's the case, we need accurate author/licensing information. A general supposition that e.g. "these files probably came from a free stock photo site" isn't sufficient, especially since not all such sites have licenses which are compatible with Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Krok6kola But at least some of the photos come from non-free sources. And because the uploader has marked them all as own work, there’s no way to know if they’re really from non-copyrighted sources, so COM:PCP applies until/unless the uploader is willing to actually source their uploads. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 23:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Fraudulent claims by uploader. At least some yoinked from non-free sources; no specific exceptions noted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Various other rock art near laas geel cave complex.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-cave-paintings-laas-geel-rock-exterior-near-hargeisa-somalia-image83351374 Krok6kola (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I’m not sure why this doesn’t qualify for speedy deletion. It’s sold on a commercial stock image site. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. This is unambiguously a copyvio; "royalty-free" does not mean "freely licensed". Omphalographer (talk) 22:46, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are thousands of images on the Commons that are from a webpage and give no other information. Krok6kola (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Krok6kola But you removed a speedy deletion tag from an image that was taken from a commercial stock image website. And sure, there are probably thousands of images on Commons that are from the web and most of them should be deleted. I don't know why that's a reason for ignoring a pretty textbook case of COM:PCP. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:35, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should go through a regular deletion process. Krok6kola (talk) 19:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kagamid (talk · contribs)

GoogleMaps CopyVio (via CopyVio of the indicated source website)

Enyavar (talk) 14:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kagamid (talk · contribs)

Per the metadata of one file and the general look of all four, these are screenshots of some kind and unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. The files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 08:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Staggered balcony facade with trapezoid windows at Alpina Eclectic Hotel & Spa, Chamonix-Mont-Blanc, Haute-Savoie, France.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama for architectural works in France. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:09, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel Alpina @ Chamonix (15170387537).jpg

There is no freedom of panorama for architectural works in France The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:10, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:List-graph.png

replaced by the corrected file Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:26, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vivenu logo black.png

Uploaded as own work, but this is clearly a corporate logo DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:55, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archaeologist Sara Perry at TAG conference 2025.jpg

Per Exif data, the photographer is Richard Wallwork, who is probably not identical with the uploader. We'd need a COM:VRT permission to keep this file. Rosenzweig τ 08:58, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for flagging this, Rosenzweig. I borrowed a camera from a colleague to take this photograph, I'm not sure what evidence I can provide for that - paging @Lajmmoore who was with me at the 'Wiki photo booth' at TAG conference! With thanks. Medievalfran (talk) 13:37, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Rosenzweig - Richard Wallwork is my boyfriend and I borrowed the camera from him, which we used. I took a photo of Fran using the very camera to photograph another person - I can send you directly the google photos link? Lajmmoore (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing a photo of the camera won't really be much help, at best one could see it's the same model. Probably the best cause of action would be if you two sent that story to COM:VRT per e-mail, referencing this deletion request, so we have it on record. If VRT accepts that's how it happened, the DR should be closed. Sorry for any inconvenience, but such things are important to us. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's fine - it didn't occur to us that he'd be on the exif data, so you're right to question it. I'll email now Lajmmoore (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2025121810009102 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goltz - Médaillon uniface - Thiele, Alfred (1886-1957) - btv1b10234415p.jpg

Ca. 1914 German medal by de:Alfred Thiele (Bildhauer) (1886–1957), still protected by copyright in Germany. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2028. Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:La France sur le Rhin - Médailles et décorations - Bénard, Raoul - btv1b102342991.jpg

WW I era French medal by fr:Raoul Bénard (1881–1961), still protected by copyright in France. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2032. Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Léopold de Bavière - Médailles et décorations - Rungas, Berthold (1889-1964) - btv1b10234363g.jpg

Ca. 1915 German medal by Berthold Rungas (1889–1964), still protected by copyright in Germany. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2035. Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nach Walhall - Médailles et décorations - Löwental, Arthur Imanuel (1879-...?) - btv1b10234368q.jpg

WW I era German medal by Arthur Loewenthal (1879–1964), still protected by copyright in Germany. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2035. Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:قداره با حکاکی های طلا.jpg

تبلیغاتی هست. نشان واره و آدرس وبگاه در این تصویر درج شده است. Amir Izadmousa (talk) 09:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:قداره و قمه.jpg

داری واترمارک هست Amir Izadmousa (talk) 09:50, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/"971-8591-15-X"

Each of these images are cited as "own work by the uploader' (Regenerate (talk · contribs)) but also contain the ISBN link "971-8591-15-X". A search on Google Books yields Talambuhay ng mga bayani at natatanging Pilipino, authored by Renato R. Mateo and published by Arenar Books Marketing in 1998. Being published in 1998 means these drawings or sketches of Philippine statesmen are not yet in the public domain (even if several may have been based on public domain old images). There should also be a proof that Regenerate was a former employee of the said publishing company, if their claims are true.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 09:54, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMA CI.png

I request deletion of this file because it is a legacy corporate logo that no longer reflects the entity’s current legal name and organizational structure. Following a formal rebranding (company name change and related organizational restructuring), continued availability of this file is misleading and risks being mistaken for an official, current identifier. The current official logo is available at [File:GKR Partners.png]. Financier622 (talk) 10:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Applied Management of Arts CI.png

I request deletion of this file because it is a legacy corporate logo that no longer reflects the entity’s current legal name and organizational structure. Following a formal rebranding (company name change and related organizational restructuring), continued availability of this file is misleading and risks being mistaken for an official, current identifier. The current official logo is available at [File:GKR Partners.png]. Financier622 (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Nick Flatt 36 Artist" Street Art- Camden High street London (39562999511).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 10:36, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti, Plim, rue Gramat, hiver 2023-24 (Toulouse).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:37, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ONCLE K. (cartoucherie de Toulouse).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:UT2J, l'Arche - graffiti Zbeul ta fac.jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:39, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti in Cairo.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Egypt A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salah Graffiti in Cairo.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Egyot A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The FOP in Egypt situation in Commons was OK for many years, then it was changed based on an individual conclusion and hastily through a short discussion that was not attended by many users or specialists and there was no opportunity to discuss this point well. The discussion did not present any evidence that FOP isn't allowed in Egypt, only the user was unsure of it and the discussion was not settled. We requested time to consult with legal experts in Egypt, and as a long-time and experienced person in free licenses I'm sure the situation is fine, unlike in other countries that explicitly prohibit it (such as South Africa), so please do not delete the file for now. --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 14:20, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eve graffiti.JPG

No freedom of panorama in Egypt A1Cafel (talk) 10:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti on brick wall (Unsplash).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Egypt A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Protester opposing President Mohamed Morsi sits next to graffiti depicting Morsi on a wall in Cairo 1-Jul-2013.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Egypt A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sampo 2.JPG

No freedom of panorama in Egypt A1Cafel (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The FOP in Egypt situation in Commons was OK for many years, then it was changed based on an individual conclusion and hastily through a short discussion that was not attended by many users or specialists and there was no opportunity to discuss this point well. The discussion did not present any evidence that FOP isn't allowed in Egypt, only the user was unsure of it and the discussion was not settled. We requested time to consult with legal experts in Egypt, and as a long-time and experienced person in free licenses I'm sure the situation is fine, unlike in other countries that explicitly prohibit it (such as South Africa), so please do not delete the file for now. --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 14:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maestro Leon cardona García.jpg

The provided source doesn't have any info on the photographer, and I can't find any elsewhere. The earliest online source I found (here from 2010) reserves all rights. In any case the provided creation date (1941) is likely incorrect because Cardona was born in 1927, and is does not look 14 in this photo. To be public domain in Colombia (life+80) the photographer should have died in latest 1944 (or 45 starting in January), but without more information we cannot assume this, and to me it seems unlikely that Cardona is 18 in the photo. GanzKnusper (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:E10 cowboy - Lucky Luke graffiti, June 2009.jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti @ Rue Joséphin Soulary @ Croix-Rousse @ Lyon (35584742433).jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biggie graffiti.jpg

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 10:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erica Akerlund.jpg

It is mine and I don't want it here. Ericascircus (talk) 11:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Baptism certificates of the Philippines

These baptismal certificates are not yet {{PD-Philippines}}.

File:0319jfSaint Francis Church Tree Meycauayan Heritage Belfry Bulacanfvf 20.JPG - issued in 2016
File:Roman Catholic Infant Baptism in Pandi Church 05.jpg - issued in 2022*
File:Roman Catholic Infant Baptism in Pandi Church 06.jpg - *ditto

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 11:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

files at Category:Polygondwanaland

Nonfree licensing. Usage terms at [5] does not explicitly permiss Derivative works, only copies/physical reproductions of the materials. "This album is FREE. Free as in, free. Free to download and if you wish, free to make copies.Make tapes, make CD’s, make records."

--Cawfeecrow (talk) 11:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep "We do not own this record. You do" sounds like a public domain dedication, or as close as you can get, to me. In addition, the bootlegger page on their site, which has audio of their live performances (including the songs in this album) specifically encourages derivative works[6]. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 13:14, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but with a condition attached to it:

"Only deal is you’ve gotta send us some of them to sell on pdoomrecords.com - whatever you feel is a fair trade is cool with us."

As I understand it, The Definition of Free Cultural Works (the definition Commons uses) does not list something like this as a permissible restriction

Sure theres this at the FAQ:

Can I do a remix? Hell yeh!

But it does not specify whether or not remixes are under the same condition as bootlegs. It could be, it could not be, but I still have my doubts as whether or not this album is Free or not (especially considering it's new licensing {..or at least the track Crumbling Castle the album itself just links to BOOTLEGGER again with each individual track using "© All rights reserved"}, being CC BY ND, which almost implies restrictions on some derivatives in the first place?). Unclear terms all around, is my point. Cawfeecrow (talk) 23:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just caught this on BOOTLEGGER:

"The original FREE bootlegger album. You don’t have to send us copies of this. It’s FREE - FREE as in FREE. Send us some if u want though!"

Which (to my understanding) would mean that Polygondwanaland is not under the terms of BOOTLEGGER. This is nice but does not answer the question of whether or not all derivatives are allowed (or even worse, leaves us at square one because at least BOOTLEGGER does explicitly permiss remixes to some extent. Frustrating.) Cawfeecrow (talk) 00:05, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. From the official King Gizzard website (archive link): "This album is FREE. Free as in, free. Free to download and if you wish, free to make copies. Make tapes, make CD’s, make records...We do not own this record. You do. Go forth, share, enjoy."{{PD-author|King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard}}. Tapes and records (for instance, audio cassettes and LP records) including this material are necessarily transformative, as analog derivatives of digital works, so derivative works are allowed. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:32, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point on tapes and records being derivatives, but wouldn't that still be only permissing one type of derivative? I find it odd they didn't list remixes as an example and only focused on physical copies of their works.

Before you say anything, I do realize I'm being extremely pedantic here, I almost tsked at myself making this DR. However, I still find it a necessary conversation to have at the very least. These are very loose usage terms. Cawfeecrow (talk) 23:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Lunax338 (talk · contribs)

Screenshots displaying illegal software (software license key generators/cracks/..)

Btrs (talk) 12:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Данный перстень.jpg

Poor quality photoshot of a ring, not in use, user's only remaining upload Btrs (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Залізнична рейка «Діошдьєр, Miskolc — OSCYOR 1910 B.A.».jpg

Не тей файл Girnikdima1 (talk) 12:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kotlin Full Color Logo Mark RGB.png

There is a vector (SVG) version exactly like this:

Kotlin icon (2021-present).svg Jooja (talk) 12:56, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:KotlinLogotip.png

Official vector image available (also this version is outdated anyway): Kotlin logo (2016-2021).svg Jooja (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kotlin Icon.png

Official vector image available (also this version is outdated anyway): Kotlin icon (2016-2021).svg Jooja (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muerte de Juan Sebastián Elcano en su navío.jpg

He reproducido la imagen de una manera más nítida en wikimedia commons Marraski (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Francesco Carlo Boffo.png

Этот файл был ошибочно атрибутирован к Францу Карловичу Боффо. На изображении представлен не архитектор Боффо, а французский журналист Луи Франсуа Бертен ( File:Louis-Francois Bertin.jpg). File:Francesco Carlo Boffo.png необходимо удалить, так как он ошибочный и не относится к Францу Боффо. Safirochka (talk) 14:02, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Можно просто переименовать: {{Rename}}. Nakonana (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: can be renamed. --Abzeronow (talk) 03:05, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Francesco Carlo Boffo.png

На фото изображён не Франц Карлович Боффо, итальянский архитектор. Safirochka (talk) 13:12, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Out of scope. Inferior (and unused) version of File:Louis-Francois Bertin.jpg. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 13:58, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Moiré pattern. --RAN (talk) 05:22, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ÖZAL T. YASIN RAMAZAN ORHAN UĞUROĞLU BAĞDAT 1984.jpg

The uploader claims own work from 1984 as a journalist. However, no evidence is provided that the copyright was retained by the photographer rather than the newspaper (Günaydın Gazetesi). Possible employee/commissioned work. Request deletion or clarification. ~2025-35026-57 (talk) 13:16, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Turkey does not have an automatic work for hire rule like some other countries do. Also, this photo appears to be previously unpublished, the photographer would have retained all rights in this case. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 13:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masyaf 26-04-2013.jpg

Copyvio (different watermark, different post prod tools on mass upload) Factory (talk) 13:33, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masyaf waterfalls.jpg

Copyvio (different watermark, different post prod tools on mass upload) Factory (talk) 13:37, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Política do café com leite (Minas e São Paulo) até 1930.pdf

There is a better resolution with the same license here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pol%C3%ADtica_do_caf%C3%A9_com_leite_(Minas_e_S%C3%A3o_Paulo)_at%C3%A9_1930.jpg ArlindoPereira (talk) 13:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArlindoPereira: poderias carregar a nova versão em formato .pdf também? A página antiga viraria redirect da nova. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 13:50, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Acho que não seria conveniente, uma vez que este arquivo, em resolução menor, tem cerca de 16MB, enquanto que o outro, original da Hemeroteca da Biblioteca Nacional, tem 1,5MB. Podemos fazer um simples redirecionamento deste para o outro? Em todo caso, já editei todos os artigos em todas as línguas que faziam referência à esta imagem, para usar a outra (eram poucos). --ArlindoPereira (talk) 13:56, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Não faz mal. Carregue a versão nova em formato .PDF e depois que eliminar a versão antiga se faz o redirect. Não pode redirecionar formatos diferentes e nem sobrepor versões diferentes. Por isso, sugeri que carregasse outra versão. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 14:08, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Solicitei a permissão para sobrescrever o arquivo. ArlindoPereira (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Não falei isso... 🙄

Falei para CARREGAR OUTRO ARQUIVO. Não para overwrite a versão atual. Esta será eliminada. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 15:02, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, não tinha entendido. Subi como https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:I0036251-3-0-003208-002157-003208-002157.pdf. ArlindoPereira (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pdf is unnecessary for image files. Abzeronow (talk) 01:45, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Источники.png

Text-only image, not in use, user's only remaining upload Btrs (talk) 14:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tinguely genève 040115.jpg

copyvio, contemp. artwoork, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 14:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Méta-Harmonie II.jpg

copyvio, artist died in 1991, no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 15:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:F-15SA HARPOON MISSILE.webp

Since it is a SAUDI aircraft, no PD US Gov license does work; besindes it has a vast distribution on the web. As such it should be a copyright violation. Msb (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shimonosek Fugui.jpg

No COM:FOP Japan for artistic works. I'd like to see an exchange if sewer covers may be considered (part of) buildings, though. Grand-Duc (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Behnam Bani Shomal.jpg

No indication of publication under a free license - no metadata - possible copyvio UnrivaledIr (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clinton on his birthday.jpg

This may be in the public domain due to lack of copyright notice or renewal (this has to be proved), but the current license is wrong. Yann (talk) 15:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henri Moissan HiRes.jpg

Crudely upscaled photograph whose processing detracts from EV. JayCubby (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I do not understand this del request. It is in use in numerous wikis. Thus, it has an obvious EV. Michał Ski (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Michał Ski, File:Henri Moissan.jpg is not upscaled, and has more detail. I propose that as its replacement. JayCubby (talk) 19:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
JayCubby: But what's the point of deleting this one? Why wouldn't you let users choose which photo they prefer to use? Michał Ski (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good quality and paired with the original. --RAN (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robert Lewandowski (7495754686).jpg

Derivative work of a third party photograph ~2025-33006-17 (talk) 15:56, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

are you dumb is not derivatives work of third part photograph Nabakaphoto (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'kept'

Nabakaphoto (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, @Nabakaphoto please be civil and refrain from personal attacks. Thanks. Tvpuppy (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jose joaquin de arrillaga.JPG

I'm pretty sure that this passage is too long to be covered by PD-text, but I'll let an admin decide. DS (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadion Narodowy (7495733784).jpg

Although Poland has a freedom of panorama legislation, it only covers works installed permanently. Günther Frager (talk) 16:08, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:European Youth Event 2023 Strasbourg 148.jpg

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2338 (Alfred Döblin).jpg

Not PD. will first be PD in 2049 Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 16:17, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:02016 0093 Robert Lewandowski.jpg

Although Poland has a freedom of panorama legislation, it only covers works installed permanently. Günther Frager (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harald Rüschenbaum - Trio.jpg

Die angebliche Urheberin ist auf dem Fotoabgebildet, das ist sicher keine Selfie. Alnilam (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Recreación de la bandera federal catalana utilizada en 1873.png

Totally made-up flag, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera republicana federal catalana.png, where an identical image was deleted. Scolaire (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sani Araby tualiah PPJ APM.jpg

The claim of "own work" is highly doubtful. This image depicts a public official ceremony where Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad conferred an honorary appointment on Sani Araby (APM), dated 2 March 2019 in Langkawi. An almost identical photograph appears in a Harian Metro (Media Prima) news article covering the same event, indicating that this image is likely a news photograph taken by a press photographer, not by the uploader.(https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2019/03/429040/mapim-apm-bakal-latih-sukarelawan) No evidence has been provided that the uploader is the original photographer or that the image was released under a free license by the copyright holder. ~2025-35026-57 (talk) 16:49, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:WarOfTheRobots1978.webm

User claims to be a copyright holder on the film. Highly dubious that this user owned the copyright and just happened to release it freely like this. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mural ul. Rostka w Chorzowie - Lewandowski, Cieślik, Lubański - 2 (cropped).jpg

File:Pink Floyd FC.jpg

File:Nick Mason in 1974.jpg

The source is a webapage of a newspaper, but there is no information it was published in Argentina in 1974. Also the photo is all over the web (even a colored one), so even if it were published in Argentina in 1974, it is not even clear it was published simultaneously in Argentina. We cannot keep it unless we have actual information about its publication. Günther Frager (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I didn't notice that, I support the nomination. Crispybeatle (talk) 20:02, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ДинаВенедиктова.jpg

случайно выложили Aisyluxa (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dock and boats, by Frances Miller Mumaugh.jpg

the painter died in 1933 and no date for this painting is given, so the pre-1930 US license may be invalid Geoffroi 17:56, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Creația - Ziua 1.jpg

Artwork of living artist Iacob Coman, no proof of permission. Gikü (talk) 17:57, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader appears to be artist's daughter. Am reaching out for permissions. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 18:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laugardalsvollur 4.jpg

COM:FOP Iceland, to be restored in 2030 due to author is unknown SomeFancyUsername (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:D-ANDI AIRCRAFT Airbus A320-232 (2).jpg

wrong title for the picture Sg1959 (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wrong title for this picture Sg1959 (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed the file to File:D-AIBG AIRCRAFT Airbus A319-112 (2).jpg as requested. Geoffroi 18:25, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file was renamed. --Rosenzweig τ 10:02, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-ANDI AIRCRAFT Airbus A320-232 (1).jpg

wrong title fpr this picture Sg1959 (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-ANDI AIRCRAFT Airbus A320-232.jpg

wrong title for this picture... Sg1959 (talk) 18:18, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:United States Department of Housing and Urban Development headquarters.jpg

This is an AI generated image and not a photo of the actual Robert C. Weaver building. ~2025-41332-27 (talk) 18:21, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:DTV czołówka 3D.ogg

Just like with [[7]] the {{PD-Poland}} applies only to photographs. This is NOT a photograph. Nejvis (talk) 18:26, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Il bosco delle maschere.jpg

Very low quality, no exif, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Haplorrhines.jpg

duplicate image Bioanthropologist1 (talk) 18:40, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:59, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto Seeck - Selbstporträt 1904.jpg

This clearly is not the picture of a 36 year old male (Seeck was born 1868), so either the date is wrong or it isnt Seeck at all. I could not verify, whats exactly wrong. ~2025-33812-81 (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sourcing looks accurate to me[8]. -Nard (Hablemonos) (Let's talk) 21:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The source is a private polish auction house. It is possible they make mistakes. Again the question: would you say, that a 36 old male looks like this? It is possible a) that the year is wrong, but the person correct, or b) that the year is correct, but the person wrong. As long as we dont know what is what, this image is an unreliable source. ~2025-33812-81 (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Could be renamed by either removing '1904' or changing 'Selbstporträt' to 'portrait'. Unfortunately there is no higher resolution available on the web, IMO the bottom right '1904' might also be '1934'. --Achim55 (talk) 07:08, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1934 would work. Seeck would be in his sixties and probably looked like that. ~2025-33812-81 (talk) 09:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and also renamed --Ras67 (talk) 10:29, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RealFlagSubdivisioner (talk · contribs)

Uploaded by now-blocked account that did some vandalism. Looks to me like the return of one of the LTA flag vandals. All claimed as "own work", which is unlikely but if true means they are out of scope. I suspect these can be speedied by someone more familiar with the situation than I am; going through a DR only in case there is something here someone can salvage.

Jmabel ! talk 19:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete LTA sockpuppet uploads. Commons users shouldn't be required to repair LTA uploads. This is encouragement for the sockmaster. Geoffroi 20:18, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noting the existence of another sockpuppet, RealFlagsofSubdivisions. I don't know if the files uploaded by that account can be added to this request, or if they need to be nominated in a new request. Emk9 (talk) 06:58, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag map of Morocco (Amazigh Flag).png

This file was initially tagged by Geoffroi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: LTA uploads please see Com:AN/Blocks and protections Not an obvious copyvio, although the outline map would need to be credited. The flag is a real flag, associated with one of the peoples of that country: File:Berber flag.svg. Perhaps this should be deleted on some other region (I'd be happy to get rid of "flag maps" entirely; uploader appears to be an LTA), but I don't think we should speedy this as a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 20:22, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LTA upload. I tagged it as a copyvio because I didn't see an LTA sockmaster option. Please stop helping and coddling sockmasters. You're making this way too hard on patrollers. Should we duscuss this at AN/U? Geoffroi 20:30, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag map of Algeria (Amazigh Flag).png

This file was initially tagged by Geoffroi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: LTA uploads please see Com:AN/Blocks and protections Not an obvious copyvio, although the outline map would need to be credited. The flag is a real flag, associated with one of the peoples of that country: File:Berber flag.svg. Perhaps this should be deleted on some other region (I'd be happy to get rid of "flag maps" entirely; uploader appears to be an LTA), but I don't think we should speedy this as a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 20:23, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LTA upload. I tagged it as a copyvio because I didn't see an LTA sockmaster option. Please stop helping and coddling sockmasters. You're making this way too hard on patrollers. Should we duscuss this at AN/U? Geoffroi 20:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toy Chica.jpg

Pornographic image of a character just to annoy WikipediaPornographic image of a character just to annoy Wikipedia. User34790 (talk) 20:23, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Book Cover.png

Out of scope: Book advertisement by single-time contributor; also bad format (doesn't show the whole cover. File does not contain the book either - and seeing that the author is a conspiracy nut, I don't think we'd want to host the full PDF, either.) Enyavar (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Book Cover.png

This appears to be a copyrighted book cover. Book covers are generally not allowed on Wikimedia Commons unless the rights holder has released them under a free license. Marking it as “own work” does not make the cover art free, so this file is likely mislicensed/copyrighted and should be deleted. كثيب (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; also indirectly a copyvio of the stock photo "man walking in a desert towards a city". Closing admin: please salt this filename; it's inappropriately vague. Omphalographer (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campaign poster with the image of Viktor Yushchenko as Uncle Sam. 2004.jpg

Questionable if own work Nurken (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Великі перегони кадр.png

Not free image Nurken (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Věra Lukášová.jpg

According to metadata, the author is Commons user:Ben Skála. Could you confirm the license, please? Gumruch (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for information. I recieved this photo via email to use it in the article. Is it possible to change author/licence instead of deleting?

Thanks Matyas.dudar (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Articalic (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: these images both appear to have been AI-generated. If these were based on real, freely licensed photographs, please upload the originals.

Omphalographer (talk) 21:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:علی طرخانی.png

Out of scope: this is an AI-generated image. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 21:55, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Фатулла Гамидов.jpg

Out of scope: this is an AI-generated image. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph of a notable individual, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 21:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARIYAKA SCRIPT.jpg

Out of scope: plain text. This appears to be a table of characters; please use MediaWiki tables to present this information. See mw:Help:Tables for instructions. Omphalographer (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerry Ramos.jpg

Out of scope: this is an AI-generated image. If this image was generated based on a freely licensed photograph, please upload the original. Omphalographer (talk) 22:00, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Donvikro (talk · contribs)

Out of scope: AI-generated illustrations of a festival in India. I'm suspicious that the AI model may have mistaken the word "Indian" to mean Native Americans when giving the figures feathered headdresses. In any event, an actual photo of the festival would be of far greater value than an AI model's impression of it.

Omphalographer (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:File 00000000fa20722f95985c9c9afae047.png

Out of scope: AI-generated plain text diagram. This is gibberish - in particular, the bottom box claims that a "signature" contains a private key, which is nonsense. Omphalographer (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.